Recursive misrepresentations: A reply to Levinson (2013)
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Misrepresentations
The concept of “representations”, and particularly “internal representations”, can be controversial in Cognitive Science and AI. It is suggested here that much time-wasting confusion could be avoided if participants in such controversies came to recognize the variety of different senses, often incompatible, in which such terms are used. A hypothesis is presented as to why there is so much reluc...
متن کاملCognitive Processes, Trauma, and Dissociation—Misconceptions and Misrepresentations: Reply to Bremner (2010)
In a recent review (Giesbrecht, Lynn, Lilienfeld, & Merckelbach, 2008), we critically evaluated the research literature on cognitive processes in dissociation. In a comment, Bremner (2010) has voiced reservations about our contention that evidence for the causal role of trauma in dissociation is limited. In this reply, we argue that Bremner’s arguments are unconvincing and that a closer examina...
متن کاملHonesty requires time—a reply to Foerster et al. (2013)
“Focusing on tempting situations in which cheating allows serving one’s self-interest, we suggest that cheating is an automatic tendency and that the need for justification matters only when people have time to deliberate” (Shalvi et al., 2012; p. 1264). Foerster et al. (2013) challenged this proposition. Here, we review their critique and propose that their findings do not contradict, but rath...
متن کاملPTSD in the DSM-5: reply to Brewin (2013), Kilpatrick (2013), and Maercker and Perkonigg (2013).
The greater emphasis on scientific evidence and the high threshold for changing any criterion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (4th ed., DSM-IV) probably account for many key differences between the DSM-5 and the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (11th ver.; ICD-11) with regard to diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disord...
متن کاملSample size planning for multiple correlation: reply to Shieh (2013).
BACKGROUND Bonett and Wright (2011) proposed a simple and accurate sample size planning formula for estimating a squared multiple correlation with desired relative precision. Shieh (2013) incorrectly evaluated the accuracy of the Bonett-Wright formula. METHOD To address a criticism of Shieh that the Bonett-Wright formula was not examined under a wider range of conditions, the accuracy of the ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Language
سال: 2014
ISSN: 1535-0665
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2014.0034